Abstract

Research Article

Rehabilitation of proximal humerus fractures: An environmental scan of Canadian physiotherapy practice patterns

Lowell L Kwan and Norma J MacIntyre*

Published: 20 September, 2017 | Volume 1 - Issue 3 | Pages: 104-119

Background: Proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) are common injuries particularly in older adults. Evidence-based protocols for PHF rehabilitation are lacking and physiotherapists use a variety of interventions.

Purpose: To determine practice patterns and perceptions of physiotherapists who treat adults with PHF in Ontario, Canada.

Method: A paper and pencil survey asking about respondent demographics and management of Neer Group 1 (minimally/nondisplaced) and complex (displaced 3- and 4-part) PHF was mailed to 875 randomly selected physiotherapists who were registered with the College of Physiotherapists of Ontario in 2013/2014 and working in practice areas likely to be accessed by adults with PHF.

Results: The response rate was low (10%); 83 physiotherapists completed the survey - 80% had experience managing PHF. Respondents treated 1-5 individuals with PHF annually; more treated Neer Group 1 PHF (89%) than complex PHF (68%). Most individuals with PHF were older than 60 years (64%), female (76%) and accessed physiotherapy through a doctor’s referral (91%) more than 1 month post injury (33%).

Main findings: Physiotherapists manage PHF using multi-component interventions and a minimum of 76% include the following elements: education and progression of passive, active assisted, active range of motion exercises and muscle retraining to build coordination and strength. Use of other elements was variable. The main factors influencing the treatment plan were the ability of the individual with PHF to comply, bone quality, and fracture type. Most respondents were unsure that there is sufficient PHF rehabilitation literature to guide treatment.

Conclusions:This environmental scan is the first North American study to document practice patterns and attitudes of physiotherapists providing PHF rehabilitation. Elements used by physiotherapists in Ontario treating small numbers of individuals with Neer Group 1 or complex PHFs each year align well with the limited PHF rehabilitation literature available.

Potential implications:Multi-disciplinary collaborations to design and conduct large, high quality, multi-centre prognostic studies and RCTs that evaluate the effectiveness of key aspects of non-surgical PHF rehabilitation in various patient groups are needed. Meanwhile, consensus guidelines should be developed in the context of region-specific physiotherapy service models to inform best practice in PHF rehabilitation management.

Read Full Article HTML DOI: 10.29328/journal.jnpr.1001013 Cite this Article Read Full Article PDF

Keywords:

Shoulder fractures; Physical therapy; Rehabilitation; Questionnaire

References

  1. Karl JW, Olson PR, Rosenwasser MP. The epidemiology of upper extremity fractures in the United States, 2009. J Orthop Trauma. 2015; 29: 242-244. Ref.: https://goo.gl/MwrqCa
  2. Launonen AP, Lepola V, Saranko A, Flinkkila T, Laitinene M, et al. Epidemiology of proximal humerus fractures. Arch Osteoporos. 2015; 10: 209. Ref.: https://goo.gl/u52orr
  3. Court-Brown CM, Garg A, McQueen MM. The epidemiology of proximal humerus fractures. Acta Orthop Scand. 2001; 72: 365-371. Ref.: https://goo.gl/EoMbNu
  4. Olerud P, Ahrengart L, Ponzer S, Saving J, Tidermark J. Internal fixation versus nonoperative treatment of displaced 3-part proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients: a randomized controlled trial. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011; 20: 747-755. Ref.: https://goo.gl/CfF74Q
  5. Olerud P, Ahrengart L, Ponzer S, Saving J, Tidermark J. Hemiarthroplasty versus nonoperative treatment of displaced 4-part proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients: a randomized controlled trial. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011; 20: 1025-1033. Ref.: https://goo.gl/pKvbjJ
  6. Handoll HHG, Brorson S. Interventions for treating proximal humeral fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015. Ref.: https://goo.gl/qZMyUr
  7. MacIntyre NJ, Kwan LL, Johal H, Lefaivre KA, Sprague S, et al. Rehabilitation of proximal humerus fractures: a scoping review. SM J Trauma Care. 2017; 1:1001. Ref.: https://goo.gl/QGzh33
  8. Handoll HHG, Goodchild L, Brealey SD, Hanchard NCA, Jefferson L, et al. Developing, delivering and documenting rehabilitation in a multi-centre randomised controlled surgical trial: experiences from the PROFHER trial. Bone Joint Res. 2014; 3: 335-340. Ref.: https://goo.gl/SDs45Y
  9. Hodgson S. Proximal humerus fracture rehabilitation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006; 442: 131-138. Ref.: https://goo.gl/EyfTyE
  10. Tousignant M, Giguere AM, Morin M, Pelletier J, Sheehy A, et al. In-home telerehabilitation for proximal humerus fractures: a pilot study. Int J Telerehabil. 2015; 6: 31-37. Ref.: https://goo.gl/TXvjn7
  11. Shih T, Xitao F. Comparing response rates from web and mail surveys: A meta-analysis. Field Methods. 2008; 20: 249-271. Ref.: https://goo.gl/4VudfG
  12. Guy P, Slobogean GP, McCormack RG. Treatment preferences for displaced three- and four-part proximal humerus fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2010; 24: 250-254. Ref.: https://goo.gl/pgpeZx
  13. Canadian Institute for Health Information. Physiotherapists in Canada, 2010 National and Jurisdictional Highlights and Profiles. 2017.
  14. Arias-Buria JL,Valero-Alcaide R, Cleland JA, Salom-Moreno J, OrtegaSantiago R, et al. Inclusion of trigger point dry needling in a multimodal physiotherapy program for postoperative shoulder pain: a randomized clinical trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2015; 38: 179-187. Ref.: https://goo.gl/eVWzXN
  15. Rubinik P, Calmels P, Edouard P, Genty M, Yelnik AP. Care pathways in physical and rehabilitation medicine (PRM): the patient after proximal humeral fracture and shoulder hemi-arthroplasty. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2012; 55: 557-564. Ref.: https://goo.gl/NnvCwN
  16. Singleton E, Turner R, Gulotta L. Rehabilitation after proximal humerus fracture. Tech Shoulder Elb Surg. 2014; 15: 46-50. Ref.: https://goo.gl/EUDMo3
  17. Lundberg BJ, Svenungson-Hartwig E, Wikmark R. Independent exercises versus physiotherapy in nondisplaced proximal humeral fractures. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1979; 11: 133-136. Ref.: https://goo.gl/RZ1AKT
  18. Bertoft ES, Lundh I, Ringqvist I. Physiotherapy after fracture of the proximal end of the humerus. Comparison between two methods. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1984; 16: 11-16. Ref.: https://goo.gl/1ypkhG

Figures:

Figure 1

Figure 1

Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 1

Figure 3

Figure 1

Figure 4

Figure 1

Figure 5

Similar Articles

Recently Viewed

Read More

Most Viewed

Read More